Peer-reviewed Articles
Please use the year list below to look at past peer-reviewed articles.
2025
Downie,L. E., Craig,J. P., Stapleton,F., Tan,J., Jones,L., Ng, A.Y., Hinds,M., Bosworth,C., Alster,Y.
Efficacy and safety of AZR-MD-001 selenium sulfide ophthalmic ointment in adults with meibomian gland dysfunction over six months of treatment: A Phase 2, vehicle-controlled, randomized extension trial
Ocular Surface 2025;35(January):15-24 [ Show Abstract ]
Purpose: To determine the efficacy and safety of AZR-MD-001 (0.5 % and 1.0 %) ophthalmic ointment, relative to vehicle, over 3–6 months of treatment, in participants with meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD).
Methods: This was a Phase 2, randomized, vehicle-controlled, multicenter extension clinical trial. Eligible participants were adults with MGD (meibomian gland secretion score (MGS) ≤12 out of 15 glands) who discontinued all other dry eye or MGD treatments. Participants were randomized 1:1:1 to apply AZR-MD-001 1.0 %, 0.5 %, or vehicle to the lower eyelids, twice weekly. Key exploratory endpoints included the least-squared mean difference between groups in the change from baseline in clinical signs (meibomian gland yielding score; MGYLS) and symptoms (Ocular Surface Disease Index; OSDI), at clinic visits at Month 4.5 and 6, and safety measures from 36 months.
Results: Participants (66.5 % female) were randomized, at baseline, to AZR-MD-001 0.5 % (n = 82), 1.0 % (n = 83), or vehicle (n = 80). Statistically significant improvements, compared to vehicle, were observed at Month 6 in MGYLS for both AZR-MD-001 groups (0.5 % group: 1.9, 95 % CI 0.9 to 2.8, P = 0.002; 1.0 % group: 1.1, 95 % CI 0.2 to 2.1, P = 0.026), and in OSDI score for the 0.5 % group (−4.5, 95 % CI -8.0 to −0.9, P = 0.0135). The most common adverse events for AZR-MD-001 were application site pain, superficial punctate keratitis and eye pain; most were mild to moderate in severity, and decreased in incidence over time.
Conclusions: AZR-MD-001 (0.5 %) was efficacious in treating signs and symptoms of MGD over six months, with a lower observed incidence of new adverse events over time.
Shokrollahi,P., Garg,P., Wulff,D., Hui,Al., Phan,C-M., Jones,L.
Vat Photopolymerization 3D Printing Optimization: Analysis of Print Conditions and Print Quality for Complex Geometries and Ocular Applications
International Journal of Pharmaceutics 2025;668(January):124999 [ Show Abstract ]
Abstract: 3D printing, also known as additive manufacturing, continues to reshape manufacturing paradigms in healthcare by providing customized on-demand object fabrication. However, stereolithography-based 3D printers encounter a conflict between optimizing printing parameters, requiring more time, and print efficiency, requiring less time. Moreover, commonly used metrics to assess shape fidelity of 3D printed hydrogel materials like ‘circularity’ and ‘printability’ are limited by the soft nature of hydrogels, that can cause irregularities in their boundary. To unlock the full potential of 3D printing of biomaterials, it is also necessary to understand correlation between printing parameters and ink properties. In this work, a method based on curing depth, overcuring (cumulative cure), and print thickness was developed, which enables a time-efficient and reliable determination of printing conditions for complex geometries using gelatin methacrylate hydrogel biomaterial ink. We also examined the impact of printing direction on the print quality in terms of object/print thickness and aspect ratio. Moreover, the effects of dye concentration, exposure time, and layer thickness on print quality were evaluated, with discussions focused on the correlation between print dimension to layer thickness. Further evaluation was achieved by successfully printing bioinspired corneal stroma-like scaffold and delicate structures like a contact lens and a model eyeball, substantially expanding the scope of this method in producing high-quality prints with intricate details. We also demonstrate the effectiveness of ‘Feret ratio,’ another measure of object shape, in assessing the shape fidelity of different prints. Overall, the results highlight the practical potential of this method in enhancing the speed and reliability of the 3D printing processes involving complex geometries using a low-cost 3D printers.